![izotope trash 2 linear phase izotope trash 2 linear phase](https://www.pitbullaudio.com/media/catalog/product/x/c/xchange-1143-631.jpg)
Now to confuse you a bit, I will throw in that I am a confirmed Waves user.
![izotope trash 2 linear phase izotope trash 2 linear phase](https://blackoctopus-sound.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Izotope-Trash-2.jpg)
I am under the impression and it may be wrong - that Waves is at the top of the heap. Seriously though, Gliss EQ is perhaps the nicest sounding native EQ for dialing in boosts. Well, looks like I just gave away another secret! You'll find yourself using less compression as well. If you use the "peaking Z" filter, the effect is more pronounced. Instead of a "whoooommm" in the bass it goes "boomm". The more the Dyn function is dialed in the harder it has to work to get the bass EQ boost. Normally, if you set up a lot of boost things can get muddy and sound almost organ-like. What it allows you to do is to dial in a large boost while keeping things musical.
![izotope trash 2 linear phase izotope trash 2 linear phase](https://www.audiopluginguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/APG__iZotope-Trash-2.jpg)
With Gliss EQ the "Dyn" knob works as a sort of cut. Although a simulatneous cut and boost of the same frequency should theoretically cancel each other out on the Pultec, the boost and the cut weren't exactly at the same frequency and the boost had a higher gain than the attenuation had cut. Voxengo Gliss EQ is loosely based on the Pultec EQ design, which allowed simultaneous boosting and cutting of the same frequency and added a nice bounce to the signal. IMO, it's a cartoonish approximation of an analog sound. What is a dynamic EQ anyway? Does the filter amount "Gliss" over the material, adapting to volume or frequency?
#IZOTOPE TRASH 2 LINEAR PHASE PSP#
How do you think Voxengo compares with PSP as tracking plugs?